Follow us

Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
26 Nov, 2021

Consumer Credit Directive: far from future proof

Blue piece of COFACE star

On the 30th of June, the European Commission published a draft proposal for a revised Consumer Credit Directive, replacing the 2008 Directive. COFACE-Families Europe has followed this topic closely, notably via Finance Watch and the Financial Inclusion Europe coalition, as access to affordable and quality credit is essential for families. At present, the proposal is being examined in the European Parliament, and COFACE-Families Europe will submit amendments via the Financial Inclusion Europe coalition to uphold the interests of families as consumers.

Some progress

As it stands, the current proposal still introduces some welcome changes compared to the original Directive:

  • The scope has been extended to include loans below 200€, overdraft facilities, free interest rate credit without charges, and crowdfunding services.
  • Creditors will have to notify the consumer in case they are presented with an offer that is based on profiling and automated processing of personal data.
  • A provision to ensure better creditworthiness checks.
  • A cap on interest rates.

Room for improvements

While many of these provisions represent a clear step forward, there are still many gaps in the current version of the CCD:

  • The rationale behind a more thorough creditworthiness check is to “prevent irresponsible lending practices and over-indebtedness”. However, the term “irresponsible lending” is never defined clearly. What is “irresponsible lending”? Furthermore, there is no clear indication as regards the data that should be used to assess the creditworthiness check, leaving the door open for abuses such as using exotic data sources like social networking data or mobile phone use. Algorithms have already been designed to identify correlations between huge data sets of consumer behavior data with the probability to default on loans. This could become a nightmare for consumers in the future.
    • Proposal: COFACE-Families Europe has proposed an objective methodology for identifying irresponsible lending by comparing the default rates of debtors with a similar profile, across multiple service providers. If one of these providers deviates from a statistical mean, it would clearly indicate some form of malpractice in their lending policy. As regards creditworthiness, COFACE-Families Europe is in favor of setting up public credit registers, which record all the ongoing financial commitments of consumers, and using only data available about a consumers’ bank account (analysis of financial management across a certain period such as 6 months) and ongoing financial commitments, leaving out data about successful repayment of previous credits, utility bills, rent and more.
  • While the Directive includes interest rates caps, there is no specification on the level of these caps, and this leaves too much room for putting in place caps which would have no effect.
    • Proposal: There should be some agreement on interest rate caps across the EU. These caps should also apply to overdraft facilities and other “exotic” ways of charging consumers for credit such as penalties and fees.
  • The Directive completely ignores the recent development in DeFi (Decentralized Finance), where any consumer can easily take out loans via providing a collateral. Several projects are also aiming at providing loans with no collateral on the basis of some form of creditworthiness check. Although regulating this space is highly complex, the Directive should at least recognize this emerging trend and put in place mechanisms to protect consumers such as ensuring that creditworthiness practices, interest rates or debt recovery practices are in line with existing regulation.

COFACE-Families Europe will continue following the review of this Directive through Finance Watch and the Financial Inclusion Europe coalition.

For more information, contact Martin Schmalzried: mschmalzried@coface-eu.org

Related Posts

ArticlesNews
The minister signatories are pictured together in front of their respective flags.
High-Level Conference of European Ministers responsible for Family Affairs − Vienna

High-Level Conference of European Ministers responsible for Family Affairs − Vienna

On the initiative of Minister Suzanne Raab, Austrian Minister for Women, Family, Integration and Media , a high level conference of European Ministers responsible for Family Affairs took place in Vienna on 13th June 2024, as part of the commemoration of the 30 anniversary of the International Year of the Family.

Read More

NewsOpinions
first-graders-in-a-Roma-only-school-in-Trebisov-Slovakia.-
OPINION – Ethnic segregation of Roma children in Europe’s schools demands real action 

OPINION – Ethnic segregation of Roma children in Europe’s schools demands real action 

Ethnic segregation is a widespread and systematic practice in many European countries. These practices are illegal yet continue to shape the lives of children and families across Europe. Our rights to education, housing, and health, ostensibly enjoyed by us all, remain divided along ethnic lines. For many Roma, their enjoyment of these rights is severely limited, often with the tacit support of the state.  

Read More

News
European elections in the spotlight – time to ACT NOW for families of today 

European elections in the spotlight – time to ACT NOW for families of today 

On 6-9th June 2024, Europeans voted to renew the European Parliament and new Members of European Parliament (MEP) will convene for the first time in Plenary mid-July in Strasbourg, France. While the European People’s Party (EPP), European Conservatives (ECR) and Identify and Democracy Group (ID) have seen an increase in seats, the Greens and Renew Europe have had significant losses. The Socialists have maintained around the same number of seats. The biggest increase has been for the non-aligned MEPs which are a heterogenous group, yet with most of them coming from the far right.

Read More